It was snowing yesterday so I took this large Calder-style mobile I just finished to the park, thinking the red and black shapes would probably show off nicely against the white of the snow in the photos. It’s a custom made 12 feet (3.5 meter) tall Calderesque mobile made of carbon cold rolled steel made for a client’s two story atrium:
Not a Calder reproduction, but definitely strongly Calder inspired.
And just for fun, here’s a GIF animation with a snow flurry (pun intended for the Calder aficionados reading this):
Every now and then I receive a request from a client to make a large custom-sized Calderesque mobile, a mobile in the style of Alexander Calder, inventor of modern mobiles. I am not allowed, nor is anyone else, to make replicas (exact reproductions) of his mobiles. They are all copyrighted. Yet when I draw up proposals for these kinds of projects, I keep wondering where the lines are between a mobile that could be a replica, a mobile that’s strongly influenced by Calder’s style and a Calder inspired mobile. If I copied his style to a tee, most people wouldn’t be able to tell it from an original Calder mobile, yet it wouldn’t be a replica.
The question here is not quite the same as with paintings for example, because Calder invented a new art form and he is to date the only well known mobile maker. Very few kinetic sculptors have tried to create their own style of mobiles so far, and even then, the basic idea, and in many cases the structures of the their mobiles, are based on Calder’s work. In that way, most mobiles are Calder inspired.
Diagrams I just drew up for a couple of proposals to illustrate the space available to custom sized mobiles that will be able to rotate full circle:
These are not the most impressive examples, but using 3-D modeling software allows for precise planning to ensure a custom sized mobile will fit the space nicely.
Designs I’m currently working on for large custom mobiles for a large staircase at a restaurant / theater being built on the Las Vegas strip – early drafts: